Man acquitted in Capitol Riot Trial.

National Guard soldiers guard the grounds of the US Capitol from behind a security fence in Washington, DC
(AFP via Getty Images)

A New Mexico man was found not guilty on misdemeanor charges stemming from the January 6th Capitol Riot. News this morning reads:

“The whole time he’s in there he’s just standing there,” Cron said.

Romano, the Justice Department prosecutor, said Martin joined the mob in crowding police officers who were trying to disperse the crowd. The prosecutor said Martin knew that he wasn’t allowed to be in the Capitol.

“The idea that he thought he had permission to do that is nonsense,” Romano said.

Other riot defendants have also claimed police waved them in or said they could enter, but it is unclear how that testimony will be viewed by the courts.

The original article was written by Michael Kunzelman, Judge Acquits Man Of Misdemeanors In Capitol Riot Trial in the Associated Press.

The article says that “Matthew Martin testified that a police officer waved him into the building after the riot erupted”.

The prosecution arguing “The idea that he thought he had permission to do that is nonsense” caught my eye and made me wonder if a different judge would have created a different outcome. Plenty of people have been charged for being in the Capitol that day, but I don’t think that they understood that they were supposed to leave after they had entered. Surely the people that witnessed violence and saw the officers having a hard time knew that something wasn’t right and that it was time to go, but there was so much going on that day and so many people that not everyone saw everything that was happening.

The idea that the prosecution thinks that people knew that they were not allowed to stand in the Capitol also raises questions. People are invited to the Capitol all of the time. Tours of the Capitol happen regularly. Until January 6th people visited the Capitol daily. There were no fences. Appointments could be made to talk with representatives. Advocates for change could even walk the halls knocking on doors.

Minding Hearts is building advocacy and peer support groups in each state.  The groups are created to raise awareness, educate, and advocate for those that might not otherwise be heard. We are here for encouragement, education, and support. We cannot give legal advice, but we can try and direct you in the right direction with your case. Links to legal services are listed with their states. Please share and let’s grow our groups. We are here to support families and develop resources that maintain family integrity. We look forward to your support. If you would rather become active by donating, then visit the donation page.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.